Embedding semantic actions into syntax rules

I’m hunting for terms to use in my own algorithm for a combined lexer and parsing engine. Got my algorithm documented now in my handy dandy notebook that I have scribbling in for the last week on the train and in bed.

I’m now stuck with what to call the various actors and objects in my algorithm – so back to scouring the standards to work out what names I can choose that will be accurate and acceptable.

Grammar Basics

http://www.isical.ac.in/~mandar/compilers/parsing.pdf

http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi’concrete+syntax

http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi’abstract+syntax

Bottom Up Basics

http://pdclab.cs.ucdavis.edu/~pandey/Teaching/ECS142/Lects/bottom.pdf

Dot Notation

http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~elloyd/cis672/parser.html

http://es.udmercy.edu/~daimikj/html/CSC541/CSC541LR1.htm

Conflits

http://lambda.uta.edu/cse5317/notes/node20.html

Embedding semantic actions into syntax rules

http://www.scifac.ru.ac.za/compilers/cha11g.htm

Advertisements

About metawrap

CTO Massive Interactive. Ex Computer Whiz Kid - Now Grumpy Old Guru.
This entry was posted in Parsing Theory, XPath. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s